top of page

Taking Sex Seriously: The Case Against the Sexual Revolution by Louise Perry


A mom and child painting a wall
Credit: Pexels 5799022

Sex Must Be Taken Seriously.

Men and Women Are Different.

by Nancy E. Head


Some Desires Are Bad.

Loveless Sex Is Not Empowering.

Consent Is Not Enough.

Violence Is Not Love.

People Are Not Products.


Marriage Is Good.


Those are the chapter titles in Louise Perry's book The Case Against the Sexual Revolution: A New Guide to Sex in the 21st Century. It's the kind of information and advice a mother (one who is wise or became so the hard way) would give her daughter to help her understand how to navigate youth and early adulthood with minimal wounds of body and soul.


I write often about the consequences of abortion for all involved. Yet abortion isn't an isolated wound. It's one in a series of injuries that often begins with the idea that we need not take sex seriously, that sex is not about commitment, reproduction, and raising the next generation, but that it's about amusement and recreation and can be devoid of negative consequences.


Perry asserts that women have been deceived into believing that sexual freedom benefits them even while "it so obviously serves male interests."


Society has further convinced us that men and women are the same, which has led to the idea that women can take care of themselves without extra precautions. Such an approach. Perry argues, often places women in "the perfect environment for the would-be rapist." There is "cultural pressure," she says, to reject messages encouraging women to "stick together on nights out, to keep their friends safe." Cultural pressure doesn't end there.


Our society has fallen victim to the belief that there are no "bad desires." This modern tenet presses us to suppress our natural and protective "moral intuition. And not just "disregarding [our inclinations against that which is unnatural] but actively resisting moral intuition" (emphasis Perry's), such as the need to protect not only ourselves but also our children. We shouldn't be surprised to see, she says, that after the breakdown of "sexual taboos," all taboos would be "considered fair game." Hence we see the assertion that children are capable of sexual desire and consent and the efforts to sexualize children and instill in them the foundationally fractured premise that "loveless sex" is harmless.


Not only is "loveless sex" not empowering, but it's also not all that enjoyable. Perry provides solutions to help us avoid falling victim to a "sexual culture that is fundamentally not geared toward protecting your safety or wellbeing."


Further, she does an expert job explaining inconsistencies in the jargon and results of the sexual revolution. For example, laws draw arbitrary lines between statutory rape and consensual sex because a girl has reached a particular birthday of consent.

The same girl is abused and assaulted one day and a legal prize of desire the next.

Acknowledging that there "is no other way the law could function," Perry states that "consent has more layers to it." That a female has said yes "may do as a legal defence, it is not a convincing moral defence" (sic) (Perry's emphasis) because consent can be urged, manipulated, or even coerced.


Consent to sex, manipulated or otherwise, can lead to a twisted notion of consent to violence. Women who are "inexperienced or overly trusting" can "confuse jealousy for fidelity and so be drawn to" those who would have them believe that violence is love."


Sexual manipulation extends itself to prostitution as well. When Perry explains that people are not products, she highlights contradictory, even schizophrenic, efforts in England, on one hand, to legalize prostitution, and on the other, to legally forbid sex for rent, exchanges that have emerged in college towns within the UK.


"The whole point of paid sex is that it must be paid for. It is not mutually desired by both parties -- one party is there unwillingly, in exchange for money, or sometimes other goods such as drugs, food or shelter." Perry argues, among other assertions, that sex should be done "with" someone else, not "to" someone else (emphasis Perry's). "Once you permit the idea that people can be products, everything is corroded."


This book culminates in a final full chapter with a surprising chapter title considering its writer holds an evolutionary viewpoint. "Marriage Is Good" illustrates that we live in "a natural human life cycle," either dependent on someone else or "giving away some portion of your freedom, which runs counter to what we're all supposed to want" for the sake of someone else.


Marriage is protection for women and children, not just a ball and chain of patriarchy as many feminists have claimed for decades.


Perry's Conclusion "Listen to Your Mother" offers advice "I would offer my own daughter" urging readers to trust their moral intuition, learn how to recognize sexually aggressive men, and protect themselves by only having "sex with a man if you think he would make a good father to your children."


She ends with optimism that women are wising up to the harm the sexual revolution has foisted upon them.


The Case Against the Sexual Revolution is well-researched, well-documented, well-argued, and easy to read. Perry stumbles across biblical principles through study and science although not completely as she supports same-sex marriage.


She avoided any argument of abortion except to say this: "And whatever you think about the ethical status of the fetus, we should all be able to agree that an abortion is not a good thing for a woman to go through, given such medical risks as uterine damage or sepsis, not to mention the emotional consequences, which are not trivial."

I recommend this book for the evidence she provides in support of much that Christians have argued all along with a minor caveat about a smattering of unsavory language.


The sexual revolution was a lie. Perhaps you knew that from your youth. Perhaps you, as many of us did, learned it the hard way. When an evolutionary-minded feminist like Louise Perry writes a scholarly book backing up that claim, liberals and conservatives alike would be wise to consult it.

The sexual revolution was a lie.


"It was a lie all along. It's time, at last, to say so."


May her message be heard and heeded far and wide to the healing and wholeness of many.


 

About the Author


Nancy E. Head

Author Nancy E. Head was a single mother with five children under the age of 14 when many in the Church came to her aid. Her story illustrates common problems in our society such as the fracturing of families and communities, reflecting a splintering Church. Alienated families and a riven Church cannot minister as effectively to their own members or others until they find accord. Nancy is the author of Restoring the Shattered: Illustrating Christ's Love Through the Church in One Accord.


Connect with Nancy on her website, Twitter, and Facebook.



You can read Nancy’s HEADlines column on the 4th Saturday each month here at Mustard Seed Sentinel.

0 comments
bottom of page